Skip to content

We are a local real estate team helping you buy and sell property in Greater Phoenix. We guide your decisions using comprehensive market intelligence along with our core knowledge of local market conditions, serving your best interests before, during and after the sale.

Search For Properties





Excerpt from:  Greater Phoenix trends and statistics
.

Real Estate Property As A Deteriorating Asset.

How the idea of buying a home you live in as an investment is a fallacy.

...you don't expect a product that's being used to go up in value so why a house?
Consider your home as if it were a car: a depreciating asset because that's what it is unless you do something about it.

Of course in the long run: homes will appreciate if only with inflation but, other then that what do you have, what does a home have that's different then a car?  If it's not built like a castle: it wears down: things get old and deteriorate: galvanized plumbing or aluminum wiring: the roof, the paint even stucco, windows, framing and drywall, it all slowly deteriorates.  The only part of a property that does not deteriorate is the land.  Other than the land a home is just like a car: it will slowly crumble with use and so will its value.

Most home owners will steadily improve and maintain a home: they will replace the roof, repaint the exterior and replace galvanized pipes with copper: put in new appliances along with a new kitchen and so on.  This will help maintain the value of the home: it may or may not increase the value above the inflation rate.  Your home is a depreciating asset unless you do something to prevent it from being used up. 

Your car loses value and we don't complain: so why do so with a home? Because the fallacy put out there that a home is an investment.  As I mentioned earlier, a home in the long run will increase in value even if you don't maintain it because there is limited land and its lack will drive prices up in most cases even if the structure deteriorate, but in a flat market, a possible depreciating market you can't count on inflation.

Is it that bad if you home decreases in value.  Well, yes and no.  If its decreasing in value due to the market then it's because of market forces but if it decreases steadily over time, year after year and you have lived in it should you not expect it to be worth less? 

It hard to think of a home this way but maybe we should: we should think of a home as shelter versus as an investment because you expect an investment to go up - it could go down - but you don't expect a product that's being used to go up in value so why a house? 

That's part of the reason why I believe in separating real estate investing from home ownership.  Because by separating the two you put the investment to produce value in the way of cash flow, hopefully at a rate that will give you a return higher then the loss of the deteriorating asset and buy an owner occupied home to live where you want how you want without having to calculate in investment returns on a place you call home. 

So what if it goes down in value: it has been used and lived in: it should go down in value, but it won't, just don't count on it to, this will make buying and selling and investing easier just like buying a car.

top

Comments
.

Real Estate

Buying a house should not be compared with buying a car. The rate of depreciation in case of a car is much higher than a house. Further , the price of is ever increasing.

It appreciates with rate of inflation, development of infrastructure in the surrounding areas, increase in demand for housing accommodation with the ever increasing population ect.

.
.

Real Estate is a deteriorating asset

@SWRE

The rate of appreciation has been negative for the last 3 years in Phoenix so it's not even keeping up with inflation even though right now it's zero or less.

Depending on when you purchased a home you may not see appreciation ever or for 10-15 years.

Say you purchased in 2005 or 2006 and even 2007 will you expect to see appreciation in a recessionary market and maybe a depreciating market? No.   I could be another 3-5 years before one sees real appreciation and considering the cost of selling and that people move about every 5 years the result is low or no gain.  We are no longer in the period like the last 2X years initiated by Reagan.  No more!.

Of course a house is not a car but we should not be buying houses that we live in as investments.  That is not their primary role.  They are first and for most shelter.  You can make money with real estate even with no appreciation and in fact you'll need to at lest for a while. 

The other point is: you may expect land to go up but if you don't do anything to the property its not going up unless it has or until it has other values like becoming historic, but until and if that happens the house it self is slowly falling apart.

Don't count on the market coming back strong.  I think that even once we bottom we may be there for a while, an L shaped recovery. 

To reiterate.  You house is not a car unless you do something about it.  If you use it and don't do any upgrades you should expect it to devalue because it has less to offer.  The only thing saving it is land if you have it. 

This is now, it was different a decade ago and it will be different a decade from now.

Does all this mean you should not buy a house? No, but consider it shelter not an investment.  If you want to invest don't live there: invest for the cash flow.

.
Syndication OptionsRSS (Rich Site Summary) Feed Atom Feed OPML (Outline Processor Language) Feed MYST-ML (MyST Markup Language) Content Feed MS-Office Smart Tag Subscription

Disclaimer | Webmaster | Design by Fontecha Designs LLC | Powered by MyST Blogsite®